Curious behavior today
xfb52 at dial.pipex.com
Tue Apr 18 17:24:26 UTC 2006
Jonathan Horne wrote:
>>"Jonathan Horne" <freebsd at dfwlp.com> writes:
>>>ive been working on a pair of test boxes today, and 2 daemons in a row,
>>>have installed from ports without the .sh on the end of their startup
>>>ive done tons of installs on these test boxes, what am i all of a sudden
>>Nothing is wrong.
>>See "man rc".
>well, only reason im asking, as in all my previous test boxes, the start
>up scripts seemed to initially appear in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ already with
>the .sh on them. ive done dovecot and sasl2 a ton of times, its just
>seems odd that they start this behavior all of a sudden.
There are changes going on to how rc scripts work: basically, making
/usr/local/etc/rc.d work just like /etc/rc.d with full rcNG
functionality (REQUIRE, PROVIDES etc). Scripts which worked like that
would no longer end in .sh as per rc man page description for /etc/rc.d
Check out the recent discussions on freebsd-rc mailing list from the
If you believe that the new scripts are wrong, I would suggest asking on
freebsd-rc. Maybe some ports have been updated in advance or wrongly or
something, but I would think that freebsd-rc was the right place to start.
More information about the freebsd-questions