CPU affinity in new ULE scheduler

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Thu Nov 10 00:14:44 GMT 2005

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:08:12PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote:
> Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ?
> I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was "clear" ULE was 
> a better alternative for performance then 4BSD

Yes, in the workloads I have tested.  Others have reported similar

You should carefully measure it yourself on your workloads to verify
which is better.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051109/2a4285b1/attachment.bin

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list