kris at obsecurity.org
Thu Jan 13 13:37:47 PST 2005
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:27:17PM -0800, Jonathan Dama wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying that I wasn't just missing the
> obvious. I suppose that's not surprising given all the
> complicated things some builds do to configure themselves
> based on testing the environment.
> What about the "simple" case of building ia32 on an amd64
> host? (Assuming WITH_LIB32 has been set in make.conf)
> I have the impression that amd64 has been setup with an
> eye toward running a pure amd64 setup, but one of the
> principle benefits of amd64 is it's support for i386
> binaries and libraries...
> It would be nice (and probably easier on many ports) if the
> system was geared to have more ia32 centric userland--which
> I might add is the tradition for mang 64-bit OSs. Having my
> 64-bit ls is great and all, but really unnecessary +
> Are these sorts of changes in the pipeline or?
I don't believe anyone is working on it, but you can always just use
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050113/95b5ffff/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions