Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD

Tm4528 at aol.com Tm4528 at aol.com
Thu Jan 6 07:52:36 PST 2005


In a message dated 1/5/05 7:39:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
laszlof at vonostingroup.com writes:
>Your point might have some teeth if the "newer" version were better, but 
>the entire problem is that 5.x is much worse than 4.x, so there lies the
>issue. 4.10 is NOT supposed to be an "old" version. Its the production
>version. Because its readily admitted that 5.x is not yet ready for 
>prime time by those in the know. And its not properly suppored.
>
>  
>
>Thats strange, http://www.freebsd.org says 5.3 is the Production release 
>and 4.10 is the (legacy) production release
I> guess they just dont teach you words like "legacy" in troll school.

And why is that, when Robert Watson has outlined, on this list, why
5.x isnt ready yet? I find it amazing that not one person in this stupid
customer base cares about that fact? Are you all a bunch of wireless
college kids or something?


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list