umass stability 5.3 versus 4.10
Loren M. Lang
lorenl at alzatex.com
Thu Feb 3 17:38:03 PST 2005
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:09:15PM -0800, Gregor Mosheh wrote:
> I've written to the list several times in regards to
> my USB external hard drive. In summary: Under 4.10 it
> worked fine for 5 months and then mysteriously it quit
> The documentation I found for ehci+umass (albeit
> 3-year-old docs) implied that ehci was "not completely
> stable", and its omission until 4.10 (and my own
> experience with it) makes me believe that.
> My question, though, is: Is ehci+umass considered
> "production quality" under 5.3?
Not that this gives a real answer, but I having been using a high-speed
sandisk flash drive on both FreeBSD 5.3 and 5.2.1 running on two
different systems without any problems.
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.
Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc
Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C
More information about the freebsd-questions