umass stability 5.3 versus 4.10

Loren M. Lang lorenl at
Thu Feb 3 17:38:03 PST 2005

On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:09:15PM -0800, Gregor Mosheh wrote:
> I've written to the list several times in regards to
> my USB external hard drive. In summary: Under 4.10 it
> worked fine for 5 months and then mysteriously it quit
> working.
> The documentation I found for ehci+umass (albeit
> 3-year-old docs) implied that ehci was "not completely
> stable", and its omission until 4.10 (and my own
> experience with it) makes me believe that.
> My question, though, is: Is ehci+umass considered
> "production quality" under 5.3?

Not that this gives a real answer, but I having been using a high-speed
sandisk flash drive on both FreeBSD 5.3 and 5.2.1 running on two
different systems without any problems.

> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at"

I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.

Public Key:
Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD  835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list