portupgrade: installed package "succeeds port" ?
jtrigg at spamcop.net
Tue May 6 05:58:19 PDT 2003
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 12:08:55PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Jim Trigg wrote:
> > Actually, I've found that "cd /usr/ports; make index" is more reliable
> > than "portsdb -U".
> Are you sure? "make index" runs for ever here!
> On a 700 MHz Pentium III PC, it's already running for over an hour,
> without any indication of doing something useful. The /usr/ports/INDEX
> file has still size 0.
> portsdb -U also lasts for a long while, but at least finishes at some
> point :).
> Or have I broken anything in the ports administration?
> But what else is there than the INDEX file?
In my experience, while make index takes longer than portsdb -U, it is
more reliable. (I have seen make index work when portsdb -U fails; I
have never seen portsdb -U work when make index failed.)
Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else O- /"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Hostmaster, Huie Kin family website X HELP CURE HTML MAIL
Verger, All Saints Church - Sharon Chapel / \
More information about the freebsd-questions