building scons with default python3

[Eitan Adler]

On 20 April 2013 05:56, Chris Rees <crees at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 20 April 2013 04:48, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> wrote:
>> What do you think of the following?
>>
>> This fixes issue with PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python3.3
>>
>>
>> Index: Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- Makefile    (revision 315795)
>> +++ Makefile    (working copy)
>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ PYDISTUTILS_EGGINFODIR=       ${PREFIX}/lib/scons-${PORT
>>
>>  PLIST_SUB+=    SCONS_VER=${PORTVERSION}
>>
>> +USE_PYTHON=    -2.7
>> +
>>  .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
>>
>>  .if defined (NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES)
>> Index: files/patch-script__scons
>> ===================================================================
>> --- files/patch-script__scons   (revision 0)
>> +++ files/patch-script__scons   (working copy)
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +--- ./script/scons.orig        2013-04-19 23:35:11.656613793 -0400
>> ++++ ./script/scons     2013-04-19 23:35:16.127614561 -0400
>> +@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> +-#! /usr/bin/env python
>> ++#! /usr/bin/env python2
>> + #
>> + # SCons - a Software Constructor
>> + #
>>
>> Property changes on: files/patch-script__scons
>> ___________________________________________________________________
>> Added: fbsd:nokeywords
>> ## -0,0 +1 ##
>> +yes
>> \ No newline at end of property
>> Added: svn:eol-style
>> ## -0,0 +1 ##
>> +native
>> \ No newline at end of property
>> Added: svn:mime-type
>> ## -0,0 +1 ##
>> +text/plain
>> \ No newline at end of property
>
> The port is very out of date; the latest version claims to only
> support Python 2.7, they are hoping to support Python 3.
>
> What does the maintainer think?

Gavin, Any thoughts?

-- 
Eitan Adler