Questions about order of adding application to freebsd ports.

[Borodin Oleg]

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:28:59 +0200
Kurt Jaeger <lists at opsec.eu> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > I ask for little advice.
> > I wrote web manager X.509 certificates http://minica.unix7.org/ and created a freebsd port for it.
> > 
> > 1. Who could check quality and security of this code?  
> 
> The committer would check the port quality etc.

Next dummy question from novice, excuse me =)

How to become a new committer for a new port?


> Security would be the task of 'the many eyes of open source'. I think
> there's no other, realistic way to get a code review.
> 
> > 2. If quality the code is sufficient to be included in freebsd ports, then:
> > For the port it is necessary patches for two perl-ports ("good patches, yes" =),
> > what is the order of my actions?  
> 
> Submit patches via bugs.freebsd.org for the two ports, and
> the maintainers will decide if they include them.

If they do not answer for a long-long time?
Or the committer will have a bad mood?

So already it was some times.
The minica application depends on patches for Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA & Crypt::OpenSSL::CA.

> Submit a shar file for the new port, also via bugs.freebsd.org.
> Post the PR numbers as a followup to this mail 8-)
 


-- 
With best regards,

Oleg Borodin
+7-952-058-72-64
borodin at unix7.org
onborodin at gmail.com