openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client (Miroslav Lachman)

[Lee Brown]

> Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30:
> > On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
> >> both samba44
> >> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
> >> Or samba44 and KDE?
> >>
> >> If yes, then that sucks...
> >
> > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
> > the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
> > packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see
> > removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the
> > complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable
> > this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different
> > licenses)?
>
> And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly?
> We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper
> variable / option for this.
>
> Miroslav Lachman
(sorry for losing the headers, I had to copy/paste this as I switched
from digest to individual).

Is there a satisfactory answer to Miroslav's question?

I'm in the same predicament, I can't upgrade anything without removing
libreoffice, presumably because of samba.
I've tried looking through the tree of options for libreoffice and
samba, but I'm at a loss.