openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client (Miroslav Lachman)

[Miroslav Lachman]

Lee Brown wrote on 2017/01/11 00:31:
>> Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30:
>>> On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
>>>> both samba44
>>>> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
>>>> Or samba44 and KDE?
>>>>
>>>> If yes, then that sucks...
>>>
>>> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
>>> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
>>> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see
>>> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the
>>> complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable
>>> this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different
>>> licenses)?
>>
>> And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly?
>> We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper
>> variable / option for this.
>>
>> Miroslav Lachman
> (sorry for losing the headers, I had to copy/paste this as I switched
> from digest to individual).
>
> Is there a satisfactory answer to Miroslav's question?
>
> I'm in the same predicament, I can't upgrade anything without removing
> libreoffice, presumably because of samba.
> I've tried looking through the tree of options for libreoffice and
> samba, but I'm at a loss.

It should be fixed now in the ports tree. I don't know when new packages 
will be available for pkg install / pkg upgrade.

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=431079

Miroslav Lachman