gnome@ is swamped in @freebsd robot noise, deterring human activity.

Julian H. Stacey jhs at berklix.com
Wed Jun 17 15:05:16 UTC 2015


> From: Ben Woods <woodsb02 at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:33:49 +0800
> To: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports at freebsd.org>, freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org
> Subject: Update editors/abiword

> The maintainer timeout has long since passed, and I have not been able to
> get any feedback from freebsd-gnome at .

gnome at freebsd feedback is unlikely, it's dieing from @freebsd robot noise !
	http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2015-May/author.html
	http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2015-June/author.html
robots are:
	bugzilla-noreply
	pkg-fallout 
	portscout
	linimon (aka broken ports robot)
real mails from humans are rare! 2 in May, 5 in June so far.  + spam.

Compare traffic with 10 years back:
	http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2005-June/author.html
Lots of humans used gnome@ to co-operate back then.

Robot owners should reduce frequency of robot excretions,
which swamp gnome@, contravening list definition:
	http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
	This is a forum for discussions related to bring the GNOME
	environment to FreeBSD.

This is not cc'd to: gnome@ so usual balance of traffic in archive remains.

Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
	Indent previous with "> ".	Reply Below as a play script.
	Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, HTML, or base64.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list