gnome@ is swamped in @freebsd robot noise, deterring human activity.
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.com
Wed Jun 17 15:05:16 UTC 2015
> From: Ben Woods <woodsb02 at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:33:49 +0800
> To: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports at freebsd.org>, freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org
> Subject: Update editors/abiword
> The maintainer timeout has long since passed, and I have not been able to
> get any feedback from freebsd-gnome at .
gnome at freebsd feedback is unlikely, it's dieing from @freebsd robot noise !
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2015-May/author.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2015-June/author.html
robots are:
bugzilla-noreply
pkg-fallout
portscout
linimon (aka broken ports robot)
real mails from humans are rare! 2 in May, 5 in June so far. + spam.
Compare traffic with 10 years back:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2005-June/author.html
Lots of humans used gnome@ to co-operate back then.
Robot owners should reduce frequency of robot excretions,
which swamp gnome@, contravening list definition:
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
This is a forum for discussions related to bring the GNOME
environment to FreeBSD.
This is not cc'd to: gnome@ so usual balance of traffic in archive remains.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
Indent previous with "> ". Reply Below as a play script.
Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, HTML, or base64.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list