www/squid does not shutdown via rc

[Nick Rogers]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Marko Cupać <marko.cupac at mimar.rs> wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:20:46 +0000
> Matthew Seaman <matthew at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> > >> > Also, is there a chance they will be pushed to freebsd-update?
> >
> > No.  Unless these are either security fixes or fixes for a major
> > regression (which this is not) in 10.1-RELEASE, then they won't be
> > applied to that branch.
>
> From OS point of view, this could be indeed seen as minor regression.
>
> But please consider server admin's point of view:
> - squid33 had latest release on 2014-08-27
> - squid33 has been scheduled for expiration on 2015-01-31, but was
>   extended to 2015-05-31 because of ntlm_auth issue in squid34
> - squid34 does not run on 10.1-RELEASE-pX
> - 10.2-RELEASE is not likely to be before 2015-05-31
>
> Which means that pkg installs of latest squid (www/squid34) will be
> useless on latest FreeBSD release (10.1-RELEASE) for a long time.
>

I'm also now having to patch my 10.1-RELEASE kernel to get around this
problem. Sounds like a fairly serious regression to me as well, at least
for squid users.


> > They will, however, be in the next release cut from stable/10, which
> > will be 10.2-RELEASE, and presumably in releases from other branches
> > from now on.
> >
> > Your best recourse at the moment is to manually patch the kernel sources
> > and build yourself a custom kernel on the affected machines.
>
> I was looking forward to avoid it. Perhaps I'm succumbing to conformism.
> --
> Marko Cupać
> https://www.mimar.rs
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>