Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time
Henk van Oers
henk at signature.nl
Thu Aug 20 13:30:04 UTC 2015
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what you're all complaining about. The port just
> works fine, it does take a few seconds for make to iterate over all
> options, but it's because the port has way too many options. It's not as
> if you're all sitting behind your desk looking at the screen waiting for it
> to finish.
Ok , sitting it out...
[portsnap fetch update, portmaster -va]
===>>> All ports are up to date
[root at mbox ~]# cd /usr/ports/www/apache24
[root at mbox /usr/ports/www/apache24]# time date
Thu Aug 20 15:16:17 CEST 2015
real 0m0.004s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.008s
[root at mbox /usr/ports/www/apache24]# time make clean
===> Cleaning for apache24-2.4.16_1
real 2m40.647s
user 2m39.589s
sys 0m0.688s
[root at mbox /usr/ports/www/apache24]# time date
Thu Aug 20 15:19:08 CEST 2015
real 0m0.003s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.000s
Yeah \0/ finished !
But ''find /usr/ports -name work -ls'' is faster...
(~1000 ports)
Regards,
Henk
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list