Libiconv confusion on 10.0-RELEASE

[Robert Huff]

Johan Hendriks <joh.hendriks at gmail.com> writes:

>  As far as I know, there is some libiconv functionality missing in the
>  base libiconv implementation. That is the reason some ports installed
>  converters/libiconv from ports.

	From reading the mailing lists and skimming the PRs, it appears subversion may be
such a port.  Is there a current list of ports know to need the ports version of iconv?

	Respectfully,


					Robert Huff