Libiconv confusion on 10.0-RELEASE
roberthuff at rcn.com
Thu Mar 20 16:20:53 UTC 2014
Johan Hendriks <joh.hendriks at gmail.com> writes:
> As far as I know, there is some libiconv functionality missing in the
> base libiconv implementation. That is the reason some ports installed
> converters/libiconv from ports.
From reading the mailing lists and skimming the PRs, it appears subversion may be
such a port. Is there a current list of ports know to need the ports version of iconv?
More information about the freebsd-ports