security/luasec needs bump to 0.5 - but there's no direct maintainer?
dar at darklajid.de
Fri Feb 7 13:50:58 UTC 2014
Change of mail address, new thread with a decent title (previously: prosody
update, which is sort of independent as far as I've confirmed so far).
With the attached patch luasec-0.5 builds & installs fine in my
IF (capitals used for a reason..) I understand the following output
correctly, there's just one (known) consumer for that port:
#pkg info -r lua51-luasec
(where prosody in this case is already bumped to the last release, I'm
trying to push that in , as a follow-up to a 0.9.1 bump that never
Would it be correct to assume that therefor the risk in bumping luasec is
quite small, especially since I'm successfully _running_ prosody  using
Being utterly clueless: What's the right procedure to move forward,
especially without a dedicated maintainer for that thing? Hoping for a
sponsor on this list? Should I stop the discussion here and send a PR
instead - hoping that someone accepts that one?
Thanks a lot in advance,
2: This instance is nothing but a 'do these ports run' deployment, but
2.1 c2s results:
2.2 s2s results:
Basically this means that client and server connections work AND encryption
(which is the whole point of using luasec in the first place) works quite
well/gets great scores w/ the right configuration. Haven't looked into PFS
support yet, but .. that's a different issue.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1974 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the freebsd-ports