p5-ack renamed ack, no entry in UPDATING
vivek at khera.org
Mon Jan 14 19:04:44 UTC 2013
My apologies. I use portmaster. I don't know why I typed portupgrade in
that original message. Looking at the history file from my shell I see
"portmaster -o textproc/ack p5-ack-1.96_1" was used to correct the fact
that p5-ack was leftover after a "portmaster -a" run.
I agree duplicating the info in UPDATING would be unnecessary. I did not
have it in my procedures to look into MOVING. I will do that from now on.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Chris Rees <crees at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 14 January 2013 18:40, Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com>
> >> There should be a MOVED entry which portmaster should have
> >> automatically noticed. If not, let us know.
> > portmaster did install ack for me, but left p5-ack sitting around as
> Hm, you said portupgrade in the original email? Which did you actually
> When I moved the port, I put this line in MOVED:
> textproc/p5-ack|textproc/ack|2013-01-06|Not just a perl module
> Putting a line in UPDATING would defeat the object of the MOVED file.
More information about the freebsd-ports