p5-ack renamed ack, no entry in UPDATING

[Vick Khera]

My apologies. I use portmaster. I don't know why I typed portupgrade in
that original message. Looking at the history file from my shell I see
"portmaster -o textproc/ack p5-ack-1.96_1" was used to correct the fact
that p5-ack was leftover after a "portmaster -a" run.

I agree duplicating the info in UPDATING would be unnecessary. I did not
have it in my procedures to look into MOVING. I will do that from now on.


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Chris Rees <crees at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 14 January 2013 18:40, Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> There should be a MOVED entry which portmaster should have
> >> automatically noticed.  If not, let us know.
> >>
> >
> > portmaster did install ack for me, but left p5-ack sitting around as
> well.
>
> Hm, you said portupgrade in the original email?  Which did you actually
> use?
>
> When I moved the port, I put this line in MOVED:
>
> textproc/p5-ack|textproc/ack|2013-01-06|Not just a perl module
>
> Putting a line in UPDATING would defeat the object of the MOVED file.
>
> Chris
>