portsdb + rrdmerge = *hiccup*

[Maxim Sobolev]

Sorry, should be fixed already. Thanks for raising the flag.

-Max
On Aug 16, 2013 10:03 PM, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd at over-yonder.net>
wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> Since databases/rrdmerge showed up in ports, portupgrade seems to have
> gotten a bit unhappy with INDEX:
>
> [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb_btree> [...]
> /usr/ports/INDEX-8:19441:rrdmerge-0.0_b05d69bfac64: 0.0_b05d69bfac64: Not
> in due form: '<version>[_<revision>][,<epoch>]'.
>
> (whether the version is itself malformed, or portsdb is being overly
> retentive, I leave as an exercise to the readers   ;)
>
>
> --
> Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd at over-yonder.net
> Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
>            On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
>
>