portsdb + rrdmerge = *hiccup*

[Bryan Drewery]

On 8/17/2013 12:03 AM, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> Since databases/rrdmerge showed up in ports, portupgrade seems to have
> gotten a bit unhappy with INDEX:
> 
> [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb_btree> [...] /usr/ports/INDEX-8:19441:rrdmerge-0.0_b05d69bfac64: 0.0_b05d69bfac64: Not in due form: '<version>[_<revision>][,<epoch>]'.
> 
> (whether the version is itself malformed, or portsdb is being overly
> retentive, I leave as an exercise to the readers   ;)
> 
> 

IMHO the _ should come out and be reserved for PORTREVISION.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20130817/c86b88d8/attachment.sig>