HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18:50PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I noticed that HAVE_GNOME doesn't work properly with
> bsd.ports.options.mk yet, so
> 
> .include <bsd.port.options.mk>
> .if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
> # ...
> .endif
> .include <bsd.port.mk>
> 
> won't work, while this
> 
> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
> .if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
> # ...
> .endif
> .include <bsd.port.post.mk>
> 
> does.
> 
> AFAIK bsd.port.pre.mk/bsd.port.post.mk should be replaced by
> bsd.port.options.mk/bsd.port.mk in the long term, so having this work
> or documenting a workaround would help port maintainers who are
> in the process of updating the port structure.
> 
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Gmelin
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"

Which ports are you speaking about? given that HAVE_GNOME:#gnomelibs is refering
to gnome 1.4 I think this part can safely be dropped out.

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20121010/e46cbca9/attachment.sig>