HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk

Michael Gmelin freebsd at grem.de
Wed Oct 10 10:18:53 UTC 2012


Hi

I noticed that HAVE_GNOME doesn't work properly with
bsd.ports.options.mk yet, so

.include <bsd.port.options.mk>
.if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
# ...
.endif
.include <bsd.port.mk>

won't work, while this

.include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
.if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
# ...
.endif
.include <bsd.port.post.mk>

does.

AFAIK bsd.port.pre.mk/bsd.port.post.mk should be replaced by
bsd.port.options.mk/bsd.port.mk in the long term, so having this work
or documenting a workaround would help port maintainers who are
in the process of updating the port structure.

Michael

-- 
Michael Gmelin


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list