Problems with devel/apr1 or options_group

['Baptiste Daroussin']

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:46:56AM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-freebsd-ports at freebsd.org 
> > [mailto:owner-freebsd-ports at freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kimmo Paasiala
> > Sent: Friday, 28 December 2012 1:21 AM
> > To: Olli Hauer
> > Cc: Baptiste Daroussin; freebsd-ports at freebsd.org; Dewayne Geraghty
> > Subject: Re: Problems with devel/apr1 or options_group
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Olli Hauer 
> > <ohauer at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > On 2012-12-27 09:38, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> > >> While trying to build apache22 with ldap, the dependency 
> > apr1 passes a "--without-ldap" flag to apr-util which results 
> > in apache
> > >> failing.
> > >>
> > >> * Background *
> > >> Some 450+ packages are built on a 4 monthly cycle, 149 of 
> > these are controlled by ports.conf and built using 
> > portmaster. This is the
> > >> second time since 2005 that I've been stuck and would 
> > appreciate some advice/guidance whether the problem lies with 
> > something in apr
> > >> that I am missing, or the use of ${UNIQUENAME}_SET doesn't 
> > work with new OPTIONS_GROUP?
> > >>
> > >> We used a script to modify our ports.conf to accommodate 
> > the new optionng _SET and _UNSET which worked nicely last 
> > time ports were
> > >> built.
> > >>
> > >> These are the relevant options from ports.conf
> > >> devel/apr1: WITH_THREADS | WITH_BDB | WITH_LDAP | 
> > WITHOUT_GDBM | APR1_UNSET=GDBM |  APR1_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > I suspect here is the mistake
> > > $> cd devel/apr1
> > > $> make -V UNIQUENAME
> > > apr  (-> not apr1)
> > >
> > > I don't work with portmaster (happy tinderbox user ;).
> > > Can you try the following line in your ports.conf
> > >
> > > file ports.conf: devel/apr1: WITH_THREADS | WITH_BDB | 
> > WITH_LDAP | WITHOUT_GDBM | APR_UNSET=GDBM |  APR_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > olli
> > 
> > 
> > Is there any particular reason why the UNIQUENAME couldn't just be the
> > name of the port in all cases? I would make writing the options in
> > optionsng format lot easier.
> > 
> > -Kimmo
> 
> Olli,
> 
> Thank-you for the suggestion, unfortunately the result was the same, apr-util is built "without-ldap".
> 
> I tested on two separate runs modifying ports.conf as follows:
> Run 1: (a desperate try-all run)
> devel/apr1: WITH_THREADS | WITH_BDB | WITH_LDAP | WITHOUT_GDBM | APR1_UNSET=GDBM | APR1_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP | APR_UNSET=GDBM |
> APR_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP | APU_UNSET=GDBM | APU_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP
> 
> Run2: (in case there was a negative interaction between variables, apr and apr1?)
> devel/apr1: WITH_THREADS | WITH_BDB | WITH_LDAP | WITHOUT_GDBM | APR_UNSET=GDBM | APR_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP 
> 

s/APR_SET/apr_SET/
S/APR_UNSET/apr_UNSET/

UNIQUENAME is case sensitive

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20121227/631ea4a4/attachment.sig>