raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING?

Raphael Kubo da Costa rakuco at FreeBSD.org
Wed Aug 22 18:15:47 UTC 2012

Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:

> Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
>> or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if
>> -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before
>> -I/usr/local/include.
> Everything built fine without the {CPP,LD}FLAGS additions here. I'm
> tempted to commit that change, but wonder if it will end up breaking
> some weird setup...

Coming to think of it again, removing those lines changing {CPP,LD}FLAGS
would have an impact if one is using openssl from ports, as the check
for MD5() in libcrypto.so would be done for the library in base, not

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list