raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING?

[Raphael Kubo da Costa]

Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:

> Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>
>> Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>
>>> Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
>>> or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if
>>> -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before
>>> -I/usr/local/include.
>>
>> Everything built fine without the {CPP,LD}FLAGS additions here. I'm
>> tempted to commit that change, but wonder if it will end up breaking
>> some weird setup...
>
> Coming to think of it again, removing those lines changing {CPP,LD}FLAGS
> would have an impact if one is using openssl from ports, as the check
> for MD5() in libcrypto.so would be done for the library in base, not
> ${LOCALBASE}.

I think I've finally fixed the issue in r302968.