why kdbg hasn't been upgraded?
itechbear at gmail.com
Sat Aug 11 03:09:56 UTC 2012
I just submitted a patch ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170532 )
for devel/kdbg, updating it from 2.2.0 to 2.5.1. Since I'm not familiar
with cmake, I didn't figure out how to make "DOCS" component optional. Hope
someone could help.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> wrote:
> Reply from maintainer.
> On 10 Aug 2012 11:12, "Thomas Sander" <thomas.sander at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > It has no reason why the version is so old. You can submit a PR.
> > B.R.
> > Thomas
> > 2012/8/10 Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com>
> >> Copying in maintainer.
> >> On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" <itechbear at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port
> >>> devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a
> >>> little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it
> >>> should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR.
> >>> B.R.
> >>> HU Dong
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-ports