why kdbg hasn't been upgraded?

[Chris Rees]

Reply from maintainer.
On 10 Aug 2012 11:12, "Thomas Sander" <thomas.sander at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> It has no reason why the version is so old. You can submit a PR.
>
> B.R.
> Thomas
>
> 2012/8/10 Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com>
>
>> Copying in maintainer.
>> On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" <itechbear at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port
>>> devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a
>>> little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it
>>> should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR.
>>>
>>> B.R.
>>> HU Dong
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>
>>>
>