Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Tue Nov 15 21:36:28 UTC 2011
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600
Zhihao Yuan <lichray at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long
> time, since it seem that to put a
>
> .if defined(USE_PURE)
> .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk"
> .endif
>
> In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular
> as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have
> more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2
> lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private
> directory).
How many pure ports are there ATM?
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20111115/4e5d77d9/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list