Recent ports removal

[Matthew Seaman]

On 15/11/2011 19:25, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman
> <m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>>> By its
>>>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port
>>>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no
>>>>>> PORTREVISION bump happen.
>>>
>>>> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked
>>>> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated
>>>> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put
>>>> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't
>>>> been able to put the time into making it happen.
>>>
>>> How about something like the attached?
>>
>> Ooops.  Wrong diff.  Like this:
> 
> Why have you included IGNOREd?
> 
> Just curious....

A pedantic desire to cover all possibilities.   It probably doesn't need
to be there, but my (admittedly cursory) reading of the code suggests
that by defining NO_IGNORE it could still be possible to build a pkg.

	Cheers,

	Matthew


-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
JID: matthew at infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20111115/11fc5c03/signature.pgp