Recent ports removal

[Chris Rees]

On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman
<m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> By its
>>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port
>>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no
>>>>> PORTREVISION bump happen.
>>
>>> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked
>>> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated
>>> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put
>>> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't
>>> been able to put the time into making it happen.
>>
>> How about something like the attached?
>
> Ooops.  Wrong diff.  Like this:

Why have you included IGNOREd?

Just curious....

Chris