Samuel Martín Moro
faust64 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 18 17:22:09 UTC 2010
I already tested ntfsprogs1.
I don't remember wich version exactly (found it with portdowngrade), nor
what were its problems.
But, it was for work.
We just wanted to be able to mount/write and format devices with ntfs
And we weren't able to.
It might be that I didn't think to try without libublio support (don't
remember, I'm not even sure ublio is used in the first version).
It may be usefull to get back the first version in ports, sure.
But there's not that much things to adapt in the current version.
The problem is that the person who made that port just copied the package
from linux, without porting it.
The modifications I made were very easy to find out, every
C developer should be able to do them quickly, putting some printf.
I don't have FreeBSD at home, I'm just working on it at office. And patching
ArchLinux at home.
I might not be able to finish patching ntfsprogs2 to make it completly work
The good news is that, with my patch to ntfslib, ntfsresize should now be
able to get the geometry of a device.
Maybe that was its only problem, and so it's working again?
I'll give it a try next monday.
Samuel Martín Moro
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Jan Henrik Sylvester <me at janh.de> wrote:
> As you are working on ntfsprogs, are you able to use ntfsresize at all?
> For me, ntfsresize never worked in ntfsprogs-2.0.0, but it did in
> ntfsprogs-1.13.1. We had a discussion about ntfsprogs on freebsd-questions
> almost a year ago:
> I still do not know more than I stated in there:
> I still would like to create an ports/ntfsprogs1 (back)port to get
> ntfsprogs-1.13.1 back. Unfortunately, I have not had time to do this since
> Maybe you want to check yourself, if 1.13.1 gives less problems than
> Although ntfsprogs is not maintained anymore, mkntfs and ntfsresize are
> still useful -- thus picking the best last release and fixing that on
> current FreeBSD may be worse it.
> Jan Henrik
More information about the freebsd-ports