Solutions for the PR load problem

[Lars Engels]

On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 10:51:01PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 22:00, Shaun Amott wrote:
> > 
> > I'm not sure how many non-committers were aware of / given access to tb3
> > and tb4 when they were around, but if tinderbox were used as a matter of
> > course, it would, I believe go some way to speeding things up.
> > 
> 
> So if I set up a private tinderbox and provide amd64 and i386
> 6-/7-/8-stable logs with every PR I submit it would hasten the
> processing of my PRs?

The more complex a port is and the more dependencies it has the more
work a committer has to check if the PR is error-free.
Having TB-Logs would prove that the port builds fine, and the PR is more
 likely to be taken.

It's also better for the submitter as he can see if he has made any
errors.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20100710/9ba8f60b/attachment.pgp