[Fwd: Re: acroread9 crashes after maybe 10 seconds of operation.]

1wkmmr at gmail.com 1wkmmr at gmail.com
Sun Oct 18 05:24:44 UTC 2009


Similar problem.
I'm using ja-acroread9 from ports on 8.0-RC1.
The following message was recorded.

linux: pid 1378 (acroread): syscall inotify_init not implemented

Does it mean some features are missing in linux emulation environment?

# I'm not subscribing this ml, sorry.

> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:49:40AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>> Hiroki Sato <hrs at freebsd.org> wrote
>>   in <20090617.141203.07900852.hrs at allbsd.org>:
>> hr> Robert Huff <roberthuff at rcn.com> wrote
>> hr>   in <18997.22089.242834.29735 at jerusalem.litteratus.org>:
>> hr> ro>       Um.
>> hr> ro>       Are there plans to get it to work with something more recent?
>> hr> ro> I was under the (uninformed) impression linux_base-fc-4 was, ah,
>> hr> ro> workable but no longer favored.
>> hr>
>> hr>  The ports collection still assumes fc4 as the default, so I think it
>> hr>  is the primary target.
>> hr>
>> hr>  Anyway, I will try other configurations including one in your report.
>> hr>  I guess the issue is due to some incomplete (or not-fully-compatible)
>> hr>  compat-layer implementations of features available in Linux 2.6.x.
>>  I could reproduce the symptom (RSException), but this has also been
>>  reported on Linux: http://forums.adobe.com/message/1931692.  The
>>  release note of 9.1.2 says it is solved but it remains as far as I
>>  can check.
>>  BTW, could you give it a try to set sysctl
>>  compat.linux.osrelease=2.4.2 and let me know if it works or not?
> Any news on this?
> I never got acroread9 to work. It always crashes for me.
> I am using linux_base-f10 and HEAD.
> Setting  compat.linux.osrelease=2.4.2 results in
> FATAL: kernel too old


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list