experimental qemu-devel port update, please test!
nox at jelal.kn-bremen.de
Sat Jul 14 21:26:08 UTC 2007
In article <20070714181125.GA54021 at nowhere> you write:
>On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:46:04PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> Okay what do you guys think about the following patch for now:
>> (the SMP thing might actually be the cause for ports/113430, can
>> someone verify?)
>I wonder if perhaps the port should be marked NO_PACKAGE, since quite a
>bit depends on kernel parameters that may be different on the build
Actually it originally had NO_PACKAGE because of this (and the fact
that kqemu wasn't opensource back then), but kris changed that to
RESTRICTED in order to enable pointyhat builds. Do other kld ports
still have NO_PACKAGE? I agree that using packages for klds usually
is a bad idea, maybe we need a new variable that only allows packaging
for pointyhat in order to test compilation...
>Or at least a big scary warning in pkg-message that it will probably
>crash if you install from a package and have a non-GENERIC kernel.
...or the package is older than your kernel (especially on -current),
yeah thats a good idea (which I just committed.)
More information about the freebsd-ports