TeTeX and TeXLive

[Hiroki Sato]

Nikola Lečić <nikola.lecic at anthesphoria.net> wrote
  in <20071217033213.42b48cc6 at anthesphoria.net>:

ni> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:02:45 +0900 (JST)
ni> Hiroki Sato <hrs at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
ni>  
ni> [...]
ni> > I realize it takes additional time, but considering pros and cons I
ni> > think it is better to do so.
ni> 
ni> Sorry for interrupting the dialogue, are we speaking of ~1.000 ports?
ni> Personally, as a future heavy user of TeXLive port, I'd like to see it
ni> as modularised as possible, just like X.org. Can you maybe post here
ni> just a list of future ports before you public a full tree for testing?

 You can find the list in TeXLive distribution's texmf*/tpm
 directories because I am working based on the *.tpm files there.
 From simple splitting based on them, about 1,200 ports will be
 obtained.  TeXLive distribution itself includes >40,000 files, the
 number should not be a surprising one.

ni> If it's not possible, does this mean that every, e.g. LaTeX .sty
ni> package is a separate port? And, e.g. that ConTeXt is a port (or more

 Yes.  I am trying to do so as much as possible.

-- 
| Hiroki SATO
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20071217/b0b8e6cd/attachment.pgp