Limitations of Ports System
pauls at utdallas.edu
Fri Dec 14 18:44:09 PST 2007
--On December 14, 2007 5:21:02 PM -0800 Brian <bri at brianwhalen.net> wrote:
> Information does indeed need to be gathered, and while even the ports
> list will only grab a small percentage of FreeBSD users, other options
> would likely grab a lot less. Plus, most of the users here are
> knowledgeable enough to give decent input. For those of you that don't
> like change may I suggest the book that led to
> http://www.whomovedmycheese.com/. It is really in all of our best
> interest to have the product evolve, the alternative is much worse.
This really is getting quite irritating. Not one person on this list has
*ever* said they don't want to entertain new ideas for ports. Not one
person on this list has said they don't like change. *All* of the
complaints have been along the lines of "go write some code and stop
filling up this list with posts". And that is *precisely* the point.
Yet the proponents of the Aryeh bandwagon keep throwing up this straw man
that those of us who have tired of the useless back and forth are refusing
to listen and uninterested in change, when *nothing* could be further from
the truth. ports@ is *not* a development list. Its purpose is to provide
news about ports, discuss problems with ports, get advice on porting and
so forth. Or, to quote its charter, "Discussions concerning FreeBSD's
“ports collection” (/usr/ports), ports infrastructure, and general
ports coordination efforts. This is a technical mailing list for which
strictly technical content is expected."
Get that? "Strictly technical". "How do you feel about the present
design" or "what don't you like about the present design" or "if you could
change something about ports, what would it be" are *not* appropriate
discussions for this list.
It's time to move this "discussion" to some place where those that *care*
about coding and/or redesigning the ports system can participate and
discuss code and return this list to its original purpose. The only
FreeBSD list that would be appropriate (if that - it's not really) would
be arch, which is for architecture and design discussions. This thread is
a design discussion and does not belong here. Please move it to a more
appropriate place and leave this list alone. Ask the FreeBSD maintainers
to create a new list "ports-design@" if you like, but please stop the
discussions here. They are inappropriate for this list.
And stop lying about the motivations of the many talented people who have
asked, politely and otherwise, to stop.
Paul Schmehl (pauls at utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
More information about the freebsd-ports