Ion3 removal (Re: Ion3 license violation)

[Tuomo Valkonen]

On 2007-12-13, Paul Schmehl <pauls at utdallas.edu> wrote:
> The license is what is is, unless and until I say it's not.  Therefore, you 
> can use it, for now, but you need to pay close attention because I might 
> change it at some point in the future and *then* you will be liable.

Well, I suppose that part is a bit messy, and it might be better 
to leave that part more vague: up to what is (court considers)
"significant" based on the other explanations. (That "a priori"
stuff is not in the terms themselves, but in the explanations
section. The terms only refer to "significant" changes. IANAL, 
but I think such explanations are less binding than the actual 
terms: they act to help interpret the terms.)

-- 
Tuomo