ports/98760: [MAINTAINER] www/dokuwiki: update to 2006-06-09
chinsan.tw at gmail.com
Fri Jun 9 19:40:56 UTC 2006
2006/6/10, Aaron Dalton <aaron at freebsd.org>:
> Chinsan, I submitted a security patch for dokuwiki a number of days ago
> as ports/98599 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/98599)
> and haven't heard from you yet. As for upgrading to a snapshot version,
> that is generally not desireable. The main port really should be the
> latest stable. If you think there is a long-term benefit to having the
> bleeding-edge release available to the public, then perhaps you can
> request a repocopy and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel or something
> like that. What are your thoughts?
Dear Aaron Dalton & Kris:
I saw your ports/98599 and agreed with ports/98599...but I have not
too much time last week to reply your PR for approve...Sorry :)
(Because my company had decided to move our main IDC to another place
so I am narcose or sleeping at daytime ...and move our machine at night..
It's very crazy and Orz..)
Thanks foy your quickly summit for that PR.
But, there's something problem due to the 2006-03-09 tarball has been
Therefore, The file size of on ftp-master.freebsd.org and ports/98599
are both mismatch.
Now dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz on
MD5 (dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz) = 73db29a2e92f5708d91cf1a535290000
SIZE (dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz) = 835163
May Kris refetch this file again and fix the distonfo? thanks!
Therefore, in my opinion, I prefer to put it to somewhere to avoid
"rerolled tarball" confused.
Okay, I want to change this PR(ports/98760) as a request for repo copy
and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel.
More information about the freebsd-ports