Anyone still using x11-wm/fluxbox?
bsd-unix at earthlink.net
Sat Jul 8 12:04:09 UTC 2006
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:18:26 -0400
Randy Pratt <bsd-unix at earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:42:20 -0500
> "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net> wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> > Fluxbox is now at 1.0rc2, so it is near ready to move from fluxbox-devel
> > to fluxbox. I am wondering if there is any users that still are using
> > x11-wm/fluxbox (0.1.14)? If yes, then I am happy to move from fluxbox to
> > something like fluxbox-old (got any better name?) but I will not maintain
> > it as I shall drop it to ports at FreeBSD.org. If I get no reply until
> > Fluxbox released at 1.0 then the 0.1.14 version will be gone for good.
> I'm using the older fluxbox and also know of a few others who are
> also dragging their feet. I've actually had my attention elsewhere
> and wasn't following the fluxbox-devel but I'll give it a whirl on a
> test box in the next few days. I doubt I'd request that the old
> version remain in the tree in any event since I'd keep it along with a
> few other local ports if I really wanted to stick with the old version.
> Thanks for the notice though so I can start paying attention :-)
Just a follow-up to my previous comments.
I switched to the fluxbox-devel-1.0rc2_1 version yesterday and have
not seen any problems. I left my old ~/.fluxbox directory and
configs and there didn't seem to be any problems. No reason that
I can see to keep the old version around.
More information about the freebsd-ports