[Solved] Re: Gimp-2.2.2 wants freetype-2.1.7; but I already have
?!?!
Adam Weinberger
adamw at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jan 24 07:26:28 PST 2005
spam maps wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>
>>I have:
>> gimp-2.2.2,1
>> freetype2-2.1.7_4
>>
>>When I start gimp, I get a dialog that says:
>>
>> FreeType too old!
>> The GIMP requires FreeType version 2.1.7 or
>> later.
>> Installed FreeType version is 2.1.4.
>>
>> Somehow you or your software packager managed
>> to install The GIMP with an older FreeType
>> version.
>>
>> Please upgrade to FreeType version 2.1.7 or
>
> later.
>
> Some time ago, I have installed openoffice 1.1.4
> from package. After installation, I discovered:
>
> $ ldd /usr/local/[...]/soffice.bin | grep "not found"
> libvcl645fi.so => not found (0x0)
> libsvl645fi.so => not found (0x0)
> libsvt645fi.so => not found (0x0)
> libutl645fi.so => not found (0x0)
> libtl645fi.so => not found (0x0)
> libcomphelp3gcc3.so => not found (0x0)
> libucbhelper2gcc3.so => not found (0x0)
> libvos3gcc3.so => not found (0x0)
> libcppuhelpergcc3.so.3 => not found (0x0)
> libcppu.so.3 => not found (0x0)
> libsal.so.3 => not found (0x0)
> libtk645fi.so => not found (0x0)
> libstlport_gcc.so => not found (0x0)
>
> All these libraries are in
> /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.4/program, so I had
> added this directory to LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> Unfortunately, this directory also has a library
> libfreetype.so.9, which confuses gimp.
>
> When I removed the LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting, gimp
> behaved normally again. But now I have 'not found'
> libraries with openoffice executable. Is that bad?
No, that's not bad. You don't run soffice.bin manually; you run a script
named "openoffice" that sets ld paths for you. I can't think of a single
port that requires you to change your LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
adamw at magnesium.net || adamw at FreeBSD.org
adamw at vectors.cx || adamw at gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list