56 unfetchable unmaintained ports - candidates for removal

[Sam Lawrance]

On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 00:10 +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> I have accumulated these for a little while. Reasonable attempts to make
> them fetchable again by finding a new home or archive have failed, so
> they should be decent candidates for removal.
> 
> I think they should be marked DEPRECATED and given an EXPIRATION_DATE.
> Maybe some of them don't deserve it - in that case let me know.

PR'ed with patches as ports/79666