USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk?

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Monday 03 May 2004 18:31, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Monday 03 May 2004 17:51, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >>On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> >>>Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
> >>>>maintainers serves no purpose?
> >>>
> >>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
> >>>including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not.
> >>
> >>No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in
> >> security/pinentry *after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time.
> >
> > ...at least this _used_ to work when I made the port, it doesn't anymore.
> > :-/
>
>   <http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk#rev1.365>

*sigh* *fetches the pointy hat*

Fun stuff nobody ever complained (except arved@ on IRC, heh).

I'm going to turn pinentry into a masterport with slaves for the individual 
pinentry-s.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org