USE_QT_VER after including

Oliver Eikemeier eikemeier at
Mon May 3 09:31:24 PDT 2004

Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> On Monday 03 May 2004 17:51, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>>>Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
>>>>maintainers serves no purpose?
>>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
>>>including, using OPTIONS or not.
>>No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry
>>*after* <> for a long time.
> least this _used_ to work when I made the port, it doesn't anymore. :-/


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list