Do we need a new major category (latex)?
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Wed Jan 28 03:35:29 PST 2004
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:30 +0100
Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier at fillmore-labs.com> wrote:
[ls -1 vs. ls -d]
> Otherwise you'll count files, CVS directories and empty lines. We have
> 'only' 216 ports in print...
Argh... yes. I make this error _every_ time. In case I want to see the
files I notice it immediately, but in this case I just piped the output
into wc without looking at the output.
The benchmark category has 30 entries (ls /usr/ports/benchmarks | grep
-vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l) and there are 42 packages with latex in
the name (ls -d */*latex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l), and 36
additional portnames with "tex" but without "text" (yes, this excludes
texproc: ls -d */*tex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile|text)' |wc -l), so I
think this is still a good idea (we don't have teTeX and similar ports
in this listing).
I will be available to get hired in April 2004.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
More information about the freebsd-ports