Can't make INDEX-5
kris at obsecurity.org
Sun Feb 15 20:21:18 PST 2004
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 08:19:46PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 07:48:45PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> >> I've cvsup'd the ports tree again this afternoon. I've forced a reinstall
> >> of perl 5.8.2. Doing a "make index" in /usr/ports still results in a 0 byte
> >> INDEX-5.
> >> I've got /usr/ports symlinked to /usr/local/ports due to space constraints.
> >> Could this be affecting the output of make index in any way?
> > Possibly; there's an open PR about this. Does it work if you don't
> > symlink it, or if you set PORTSDIR=/usr/local/ports?
> Hmmm, not sure what did it, but I cvsup'd again and ran through a make index
> without problems. I now have an INDEX-5 file with 10,351 ports listed in it.
> portsdb -u ran through perfectly, as do the rest of the port* tools in
> portupgrade, and pkg_version.
> How bizare, how bizarre.
A fix was committed earlier that unbroke INDEX when WITH_GTK was set,
but that would have produced errors (not just a 0-sized INDEX file),
and you didn't mention that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040215/521031dd/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports