Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 06:22:03AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> > The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
> > LATEST_LINK values.  They should either be modified to use a unique
> > LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
> > each other in the packages/Latest directory.  If your ports conflict with
> > ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
> > them.
> 
> > linux-netscape7      german/netscape7               riggs at rrr.de
> > linux-netscape7      french/netscape7               trevor at FreeBSD.org
> > linux-netscape7      japanese/netscape7             trevor at FreeBSD.org
> > linux-netscape7      portuguese/netscape7           trevor at FreeBSD.org
> > linux-netscape7      www/netscape7                  trevor at FreeBSD.org
> 
> These are marked RESTRICTED and NO_CDROM--is there really a problem?

Someone could still create package sets for internal use (e.g. within
an organisation).

> I was thinking of signing us up for Netscape's Browser Distribution
> Program--<URL:http://wp.netscape.com/bisdev/distribution/faq.html>--so we
> can put it on CD-ROM; I'll keep the LATEST_LINK thing in mind if that
> happens.

That would be pretty useful.

> > linux_base           emulators/linux_base           ports at FreeBSD.org
> > linux_base           emulators/linux_base-6         ports at FreeBSD.org
> 
> This is fixed.

Thanks!

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040206/d3183a4a/attachment.bin