Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Mon Feb 2 00:35:45 PST 2004
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 01:32, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus at marcuscom.com> writes:
> > There was a problem with testing for /etc/rc.subr existence with package
> > builds on bento. However, this is being addressed in the current 4-exp
> > build.
> Another issue with rc.subr is POLA. Previously, anything listed in
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d would start at boot time (or when you ran the
> script manually). Now, though, ports using rc.subr don't start unless
> you explicitly enable them in /etc/rc.conf. The startup script will
> simply do nothing, with no warning to the user. I got bitten by this
> last night when I updated SpamAssassin on my mail server, and found
> out only this morning that it had switched to using rc.subr.
> I'm not going to start an argument about the desirability of this; the
> point is that people need to be made aware of it.
I agree, and I was almost bit in the same manner. This would best be
done by the porter via pkg-message so that it works the same for both
ports and packages.
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040202/14f155c7/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports