ugly perl module install

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon Aug 9 11:20:19 PDT 2004


On Monday 09 August 2004 19:32, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before I go state in an article that we have an ugly port, I thought
> I'd mention it to the maintainer (ports@)

Ports@ is no maintainer, it's a mailinglist.

> Surely we could, say, include a patch to net-mgmt/p5-Cflow to make the
> port check for $PREFIX/lib/libft.a rather than the ../../lib/libft.a?
>
> If not, I'll document the ugliness in this instance and make a cranky
> comment about how knowing how to actually build software is still
> useful these days, and these kids don't know how good they have it
> with "configure" and so on...  ;-)

A working patch/Makefile change/whatever, submitted via send-pr would be more 
useful. It seems you already have spent some time figuring the problem out, 
why not provide a fix?

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040809/2e11eb56/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list