[HEADS UP] merging projects/pf into head

[claudiu vasadi]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Mario Lobo <lobo at bsd.com.br> wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 17:12:52 +0000 (UTC)
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
> >
> > Everyone agrees that altq needs to vanish, we know other code
> > exists/has been pondered;  we'll see who might come forward.
> >
> > /bz
> >
>
> Forgive my lame question. I'm just a simple user and I've been using
> altq in pf for a good while and it has just been doing a good job (as
> far as I can see, which may not be as far as it should be seen) on a
> double wan (setfib) machine. True, I don't have a big ext network load
> and the 2 links are just 1M and 2M, with 210 rules loaded, lots of rdrs,
> rtables route-tos, 2 luscas,1 VBox VM server. Never had a single panic
> on this machine.
>
> FreeBSD ALLENFW 8.2-STABLE #0: Tue Nov 29 11:35:28 BRT 2011 amd64
>
> Is it possible to explain (quickly, if you must) why altq needs to
> vanish?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Mario Lobo
> http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
> FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE)
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


http://bsdly.blogspot.de/2011/07/anticipating-post-altq-world.html for
starters.

-- 
Best regards,
Claudiu Vasadi