[HEADS UP] merging projects/pf into head

[Mario Lobo]

On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 17:12:52 +0000 (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>
> Everyone agrees that altq needs to vanish, we know other code
> exists/has been pondered;  we'll see who might come forward.
> 
> /bz
> 

Forgive my lame question. I'm just a simple user and I've been using
altq in pf for a good while and it has just been doing a good job (as
far as I can see, which may not be as far as it should be seen) on a
double wan (setfib) machine. True, I don't have a big ext network load
and the 2 links are just 1M and 2M, with 210 rules loaded, lots of rdrs,
rtables route-tos, 2 luscas,1 VBox VM server. Never had a single panic
on this machine.

FreeBSD ALLENFW 8.2-STABLE #0: Tue Nov 29 11:35:28 BRT 2011 amd64

Is it possible to explain (quickly, if you must) why altq needs to
vanish?

Thanks,

-- 
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE)