if_bridge + altq (CBQ)

[Hideki Yamamoto]

Dear David,

Thank you for your reply.  After sending my question to ML, I have
found that I did not write "pass .... queue ... " on /etc/pf.conf.
I had written the port definitions for queue in /etc/services instead
of /etc/pf.conf.  As it is Sunday today, I will try your suggestion
tomorrow.

Regards,

Hideki Yamamoto


From: David Pierron <david at wombatsweb.com>
Subject: Re: if_bridge + altq (CBQ)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:27:26 -0500
Message-ID: <439C293E.8050500 at wombatsweb.com>

> Hideki Yamamoto on 12/10/2005 5:39 PM wrote:
> 
> >I am trying the packect shaping by CBQ of altq on FBSD6 box.  The box is configured as bridge by if_bridge kernel configuration.  The target packet is UDP on IPv6.  Though I wrote output port number of the udp packet on /etc/services and wrote CBQ shaping rule on /etc/pf.conf, the shaping rule about each port number are not applied to the packet, so only default rule are applied.  
> >
> >My question is: can pf especially altq work with bridge function?  If so, which bridge function, BRIDGE, if_bridge, ng_brige, is OK?
> >
> I am running if_bridge on FBSD 6.0 and have successfully run CBQ and 
> HFSC on the bridge ...
> 
> Do you have:
> 
> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1    # enables packet filtering on in and out interfaces
> 
> specified in /etc/sysctl.conf?  It's quite possible this is necessary for ALTQ to access the "out" on the $xx_if of the bridge ...
> 
> Keep in mind that if you use the queue on a "pass" rule, ALTQ will apply to the "out" of that rule ...
> 
> HTH
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"