Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
pathiaki2 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 8 16:49:34 UTC 2011
I'm sorry. I didn't run it. I should have but a journal was required. I could
have used FFS w GEOM Journal but I was winging this in my free time while
performing my "job". (Bored easily, and easily interested when something just
"feels" wrong) So, I went with ZFS due to the gobs of memory on the machine.
From: "dieterbsd at engineer.com" <dieterbsd at engineer.com>
To: freebsd-performance at freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, January 7, 2011 7:33:39 PM
Subject: Re: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
> EXT3 - ~3000 tps
> EXT4 - ~3800 tps
> XFS - ~ 1800 tps
> ZFS - 75000 tps
The result for FFS w/softdeps seems to have been lost in the mail. :-(
> They certainly have earned the title Moronix either way.
For me, getting a debugging flag wrong (assuming they did, there seems
to be some question) pales in comparison with "my adventure to the
Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Site".
There's a reason I think of linux types as bird brains, and it isn't just
because of Tux.
freebsd-performance at freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-performance